Ergodic Trajectory

Physics in a Second Language when French is Your First One

by Thibaut on 30/08/2021

In this Symmetry article physicists and astronomers whose mother tongue isn’t English are interviewed. The article covers many topics from learning physics in English to having an accent, and at the very beginning the difficulty to find scientific words in one's mother tongue is mentioned. This difficulty can have two different origin: (1) you simply don't know the corresponding word, (2) this physics concept doesn't have a word in your mother tongue. I find that it’s the opposite for me, it's easier to find scientific words in French than in English.

My mother tongue is French, I did my undergrad and master in France and now I’m doing my PhD in Scotland with British supervisors. Hence, I’ve learned Physics primarily in French and marginally in English (through some textbooks, internships abroad, courses taught in English and - of course - papers). Now that I’m doing research and teaching only in English, I’ve realised that I’m lacking some words that exist in my mother tongue but seems to either not exist in English or not being commonly use. I’m making the hypothesis that French is more fine-grained than English when it comes to physics ¹. For example, when speaking of a lens in geometrical optics,“point focal image” and “point focal objet” are both just ‘focal point’. It may seem like a small - maybe useless - difference but making this distinction really helps you grasp more easily how a lens or more generally an optical device work. Even though the word ‘angular frequency’ for \(2\pi\times\) frequency exists, most of the time we just say ‘frequency’ when speaking about angular frequency. This happens so often that I found myself confused on a couple of occasions when I wanted to compute a period - I would initially simply take the inverse of the angular frequency. In French, angular frequency has a distinct name from the frequency but that still has the connotation of rhythm: pulsation. A last example, there is no term in English making the difference between a system that doesn’t exchange anything with its environment and a system that exchanges energy but doesn’t exchange matter. Both are called a ‘closed system’. Whereas in your first year of undergrad in France, you learn that the former is an ‘isolated system’ (système isolé) and the latter is a ‘closed system’ (système fermé). Beware of confusing one with the other in the Hexagon, you would be graded a zero mark! Of course, physicists trained in English aren’t worse than French physicists because they have (or use) less words. It might even be the opposite. I think that being taught physics with more words makes a student learn how to solve the kind of well-posed problems one encounters in undergrad more easily than their English-speaking counterparts because they have more specialised tools in their toolbox, if I can use this analogy. It also means that they can get away without clearly understanding the (sometimes subtle) differences between two concepts that have justified giving them different names. Whereas the students learning physics in English will have to do the effort to understand the nuance if they want to pass their exams.

Another thing that I've noticed - which is more anecdotal but amusing - is that some laws or principles don't have the same name in both languages. Most of the time it's because there are both an English-speaking and a French-speaking discoverer. For example, when I was in high school and in undergrad the laws of refraction and reflection of light were called “lois de Descartes”² whereas in English the former is called ‘Snell's law’ and the latter doesn't have a name. Here is another example, during my first year of PhD I was at a journal club where a paper about quantum thermodynamics was presented. A thermodynamic cycle that I've never heard of is at some point presented, it's called the ‘Otto cycle’. But, when the details of the cycle are explained I'm starting to get confused - it looks exactly the same as the most famous four strokes cycle, the “cycle de Beau de Rochas”! Having a quick look at Wikipedia to make sure that I'm not completely wrong about undergrad physics, I then discovered that (again) English and French names differ.

I could keep giving example of differences between physics³ in English and in French but I think that the main point of this article is that doing research and teaching physics in a language different from the one you have used to learn it forces you to really understand the concepts you are using (and can give rise to funny misunderstandings).